Doubtfully Yours:
I love comedy, and if The Donald becomes the leader of this already great nation it'll be awesome to unfold from a comedic standpoint.
You must mean a tragicomedy.
Doubtfully Yours:
I love comedy, and if The Donald becomes the leader of this already great nation it'll be awesome to unfold from a comedic standpoint.
You must mean a tragicomedy.
a japanese bro.
in good standing in his congregation, exposing ttatt in his blog, boasts nearly 300,000 access per month.. he is nearly unstoppable.. shou-tan blog.
http://ameblo.jp/shou-tan-jw/entry-11719728036.html.
witnesses are so anxious, stressed, highly strung..... so much for ones who are supposed to be "the happiest people"..... thoughts?.
You're not quite an introvert with the way you're talking.
be it the governing body, or the a judicial committee of the local elder body, when a two-thirds majority vote is reached, it is viewed as god’s will, as the action of holy spirit, of jesus nudging the stars in his right hand.
[and if i’m not mistaken, the minority is encouraged to change their vote, so that is “unanimous”.
anthony morris alluded to this when he unsuccessfully tried to explain why the governing body is not dogmatic.
250 million years ago a plume of molten basalt gushed up from the earth's core.
it erupted in an area now known as the siberian traps - back then it was part of the supercontinent pangaea.
a curtain of lava a mile high and hundreds of miles long lit up the sky.
for those of us who are hillary and bernie fans, which is the better outcome - to have donald trump as the republican's nomination whose unpopular with most americans?
or are we better off watching the chaos of a contested convention and the party eventually putting up someone weak like john kasic or jeb bush?
This website is infamous for its correct predictions of the political world. They say that at this point it is certain that the Republican Party will have a contested convention. Trump would have to win the remaining states by a larger margin than he's been winning so far. This would be critical with "winner takes all" states.
As for those who support Democrats it would be wiser to have Trump as the Republican presidential candidate because he would be certain to lose against Hillary. With Ted Cruz, a run against Hillary might be closer and perhaps he might win if she gets more bad publicity.
With Kasich, Hillary would get a run for her money since he is perceived to be more "moderate".
so the big a comes, your third in line to be judged by jesus.
he wants to know why you left the organisation.
he also wants to know why jws remained with the org.
i'm curious to see how much manpower a little congregation - a hundred?
- requires to keep it running.
wt writers ( klein) admitted at one time, that his majesty's doctrinal ship was zigzagging to find the right course, and many of us believed, that if we accepted the bible as true, cleaning up the teachings would establish the right bearing.
so: did you have a hobby-horse idea you were riding?
writing to brooklyn perhaps?
My "pet" idea was an explanation, through metaphor, of Christ's relationship to God and the Holy Spirit. It was based on the JW, non-Trinitarian concept of Representative Christology. Ready?
God was like a sun and the Holy Spirit (impersonal) was like the sunlight. Christ, the son of God (created as firstborn), was like a prism through which the light shone turning it into a rainbow. All the angels and perfect humans were like diamonds reflecting the light from the prism (Holy Spirit) their sparkling being the act of worship.
Fallen men were like dirty lumps of coal from which diamonds could be made when held under enormous pressure.
This belief in mind was in contrast to the JW metaphor in which an individual JW was like a piece of charcoal in a coal heap - all the JWs - which would die out unless it remained close to the others. Of course, this was an analogy which ignored the act of individual salvation in favor of group salvation which the Watchtower holds so dear.
I never wrote to Brooklyn, they would have just sent the letter to the local congregation. I did mention it to one of the elders who was later part of my judicial committee (For a reason that was unrelated to my disfellowshipping). The elder had used the charcoal analogy implying that I was getting too far away from the heap which represented the organization. I responded to that with my analogy which showed that being in proximity to others was not a prerequisite to salvation.
It's so good to be clear headed now. I don't waste my imagination counting angels on the heads of pins.